home - Knowledge base
Unified State Examination criteria for literature. Maximum Unified State Exam score Distribution of Unified State Exam points by tasks

In the Unified State Examination in the Russian language 2017, 25 tasks are assessed, of which 24 are tests, and 25 are essays based on the text. Today, in test tasks you need to either write down words correctly (and not just find them), or find two correct answers from those proposed (task 1 and 15), or name numbers indicating the correct placement of commas. Task 7 remains difficult, where you need to correlate erroneous sentences with the rules according to which the errors were made.

1 point for a correct answer, 0 points for an incorrect answer

From 0 to 2 points

From 0 to 4 points

From 0 to 5 points

For correct completion of tasks 2–6, 8–14, 16–23 the examinee
receives 1 point. For an incorrect answer or lack thereof, a penalty will be awarded.
0 points.

For completing tasks 1 and 15, you can score from 0 to 2 points.
The answer that contains all the numbers from the standard and those that are missing is considered correct.
other numbers. 1 point is given if: one of the numbers indicated in the answer,
does not correspond to the standard; one of the numbers specified in the standard is missing
answer. In all other cases, 0 points are given.

For completing task 24, you can score from 0 to 4 points. Faithful


For completing task 7, you can score from 0 to 5 points. Faithful
the answer is considered to be one that contains all the numbers from the standard and lacks others
numbers. For each correctly specified digit corresponding to the number from
list, the examinee receives 1 point.

Maximum points

Minimum points

Essay evaluation criteria

Points

Formulation of source text problems

The examinee (in one form or another) correctly formulated one of the problems of the source text.

There are no factual errors related to the understanding and formulation of the problem.

The examinee was unable to correctly formulate any of the problems in the source text.

Commentary on the formulated problem of the source text

The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on. There are no factual errors related to understanding the source text in the comments.

The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on,

no more than 1 factual error was made in the comments related to understanding the source text.

The problem formulated by the examinee was not commented on,

more than 1 factual error was made in the comments related to understanding the source text,

another problem not formulated by the examinee was commented on,

a simple retelling of the text or its fragment is given as a commentary,

A large fragment of the source text is quoted as comments.

The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented problem.

There are no factual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the source text.

Argumentation by examinees own opinion on the issue

The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature).

The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, based on knowledge or life experience),

conducted only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature.

The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave 1 argument), relying on knowledge, life or reading experience.

The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the author’s position), but did not provide arguments,
OR

the examinee’s opinion is only formally stated (for example: “I agree / disagree with the author”),

not reflected in the work at all.

SPEECH DESIGN OF AN ESSAY

Semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation

The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, verbal coherence and consistency of presentation:

There are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken;

There are no violations of paragraph division of the text in the work.

The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation,

1 logical error was made,

There is 1 violation of paragraph division of the text in the work.

The examinee’s work reveals a communicative intent,

more than 1 logical error was made,

There are 2 cases of violation of paragraph division of the text.

Accuracy and expressiveness of speech

The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thoughts and the variety of grammatical structure of speech.

The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thoughts,

the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech can be traced,

the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech,

there are violations of the accuracy of expression of thoughts.

The work of the examinee is characterized by a poor vocabulary and monotony of the grammatical structure of speech.

LITERACY

Compliance with spelling standards

no spelling errors (or 1 minor error)

1-2 mistakes were made

more than 2-3 mistakes were made

more than 3 mistakes were made 0

Compliance with punctuation standards

no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error)

1-2 mistakes were made

2-3 mistakes were made

more than 3 errors 0

Compliance with language norms

no grammatical errors

1-2 mistakes were made

more than 2 mistakes were made

Compliance with speech norms

no more than 1 speech error was made

2-3 mistakes were made

more than 3 mistakes were made

Compliance with ethical standards

there are no ethical errors in the work

ethical mistakes were made (1 or more)

Maintain factual accuracy in background material

there are no factual errors in the background material

there were factual errors (1 or more) in the background material

Maximum points for an essay

When assessing literacy (K7–K10), the length of the essay should be taken into account. The assessment standards indicated in the table are developed for essays of 150–300 words. If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and is scored 0 points, the task is considered uncompleted.

When counting words, both independent and functional parts of speech are taken into account. Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, “still” is one word, “still” is two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, “M.Yu. Lermontov” is one word). Any other symbols, in particular numbers, are not taken into account when calculating (for example, “5 years” is one word, “five years” is two words).
If the essay contains partially or completely rewritten by the examinee the text of the review of task 24 and/or information about the author of the text, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and/or information about the author of the text.

When assessing an essay ranging from 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7–K10) decreases.

2 points according to these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 – there are no spelling errors (or one minor mistake was made);
K8 – there are no punctuation errors (or one minor error was made).

1 point according to these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 – no more than two mistakes were made;
K8 – one to three mistakes were made;
K9 – no grammatical errors;
K10 – no more than one speech error was made.

The highest score according to criteria K7–K12 is not given for work ranging from 70 to 150 words.

If the essay is a retelling or a complete rewrite of the original text without any comments, then such work in all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is scored 0 points. If the work, which is a rewritten or retold source text, contains fragments of the examinee’s text, then only the number of words that belong to the examinee is taken into account when checking. Work written without reference to the text read (not based on this text) is not graded.

In accordance with the Procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs of secondary general education (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 26, 2013 No. 1400, registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia on February 3, 2014 No. 31205) “61. Based on the results of the first and second checks, experts independently assign points for each answer to the tasks exam paper Unified State Examination with a detailed answer... 62. In case of a significant discrepancy in the scores given by two experts, a third check is assigned. A significant discrepancy in scores is defined in the assessment criteria for the relevant academic subject. The expert carrying out the third check is provided with information about the scores assigned by the experts who previously checked the examination work.”
A significant discrepancy is considered to be a discrepancy of 8 or more. primary points between the sums of points awarded by the first and second experts for completing task 25 (for all 12 assessment positions). In this case, the third expert must give points only for those assessment positions for which the points given by the first and second experts differ.

After checking the USE tasks in mathematics, a primary score is assigned for their completion:

  • For basic level in mathematics – from 0 to 20;
  • For a specialized level in mathematics – from 0 to 30.

Each task is worth a certain number of points: the more difficult the task, the more points you can get for it. For correct completion of each task in the Unified State Examination in basic level mathematics, 1 point is given. For correct completion of tasks in the Unified State Examination in mathematics at a specialized level, 1 to 4 points are given depending on the complexity of the task.

After this, the primary score is converted into a test score, which is indicated in Unified State Examination certificate. It is this score that is used for admission to higher education. educational establishments. Transfer of Unified State Examination points carried out using a special point scale. The Unified State Exam score in basic level mathematics is not needed for admission, so it is not converted into a test score and is not indicated on the Unified State Exam certificate.

Also, based on the Unified State Exam score, you can determine the approximate grade on a five-point scale that a student would receive for completing tasks in the exam.

Below is scale for converting Unified State Exam scores in mathematics for basic and profile levels: raw scores, test scores and rough score.

Unified State Exam score conversion scale: basic level mathematics

Unified State Exam score conversion scale: mathematics profile level

The minimum test score for admission to higher education institutions is 27.

Primary score Test score Grade
0 0 2
1 5
2 9
3 14
4 18
5 23
6 27 3
7 33
8 39
9 45
10 50 4
11 56
12 62
13 68 5
14 70
15 72
16 74
17 76
18 78
19 80
20 82
21 84
22 86
23 88
24 90
25 92
26 94
27 96
28 98
29 99
30 100

The distribution of USE 2018 points for mathematics tasks can be found in demo version in the section "System for assessing examination work in mathematics"

Table of distribution of Unified State Exam 2018 points by tasks - mathematics profile level

Job number Primary points
Profile Base
1 1 1
2 1 1
3 1 1
4 1 1
5 1 1
6 1 1
7 1 1
8 1 1
9 1 1
10 1 1
11 1 1
12 1 1
13 2 1
14 2 1
15 2 1
16 3 1
17 3 1
18 4 1
19 4 1
20 1

Structure of KIM Unified State Examination (mathematics profile)

The examination paper consists of two parts, which differ in content, complexity and number of tasks:

– part 1 contains 8 tasks (tasks 1–8) with a short answer in the form of an integer or finite number decimal;

– part 2 contains 4 tasks (tasks 9–12) with a short answer in the form of an integer or a final decimal fraction and 7 tasks (tasks 13–19) with a detailed answer (a complete record of the solution with justification for the actions taken).

Evaluation system for examination work in mathematics (profile level)

Each of tasks 1–12 is considered completed correctly if the examinee gives the correct answer in the form of a whole number or a final decimal fraction. Each correctly completed task is worth 1 point.

The number of points awarded for completing tasks 13–19 depends on the completeness of the solution and the correctness of the answer. General requirements to completing tasks with a detailed answer: the solution must be mathematically literate, complete, everything possible cases should be considered.

Methods of solving, forms of recording it and forms of recording the answer may be different. For a solution in which the correct answer is reasonably obtained, the maximum number of points is awarded.

The correct answer in the absence of the solution text is scored 0 points. Experts check only the mathematical content of the presented solution, and do not take into account the features of the recording.

When completing the task, any mathematical facts contained in textbooks and textbooks included in the Federal List of Textbooks Recommended for Use in the Implementation of Having state accreditation educational programs secondary general education.

Below is a scale for converting primary scores of the profile Unified State Examination in mathematics in 2019:

  • The initial score obtained is transferred to the test score. Each task in the test part is worth 1 point. Writing tasks - from 2 to 4 points
  • To pass the threshold along profile Unified State Examination you need to solve at least 6 problems, that is, score 6 primary or 27 test points.

Moreover, you can notice that the first part is very “expensive” in terms of points; for one task in the first part you can get 1 raw point, which is recoded into 5 or 6 test points!

  • If you solve all the problems in the first part correctly, you can type 62 points.
  • If you solve the entire first part, numbers 13, 15 and 17 (most often these are the numbers that are solved by those who have a solid “5” in school), then you can dial 80 points.

Download the “Unified State Exam in Mathematics” CHECKLIST for free! Preparation algorithm, literature, useful links, Unified State Exam score scale.

  • Further points can be taken in geometry (No. 14, 16), parameters (No. 18) or number theory (No. 19). If you solved, for example, No. 14, took a couple of points on No. 19, solving a) and b) - this is already 88 points.
  • So to dial above 80 points you need to be able to solve problems on at least one of these topics or several:

- options,

- planimetry,

- stereometry,

For example, you solved 12 problems, but made a mistake in one, as a result you get 11 primary and 56 test points, but could get 62 points (!), if they hadn’t made a mistake in some number, it could have even been the simplest number 1. If you make a mistake again, you will get 50 points for the first part. A point for the simplest task No. 1 “weighs” the same as one point for complex planimetry No. 16; the computer doesn’t care where you scored it. The main strategy is to be careful in the first part.

Examination plan for the Unified State Examination in mathematics

The duration of the work is 3 hours 55 minutes. If you plan to complete tasks high level difficulties numbered 18-19, then the first part No. 1-12 should take you no more than 30 minutes.

Good luck to everyone on the exam!

The 2018-2019 academic year will be the graduation year for many Russian schoolchildren, who are already concerned about the issues of successfully passing the Unified State Exam and successful admission to a good university.

We will tell you how exam papers are checked in different subjects, how the scale for converting Unified State Exam points into grades works, and what innovations you can expect in 2019.

Principles for assessing work on the Unified State Exam 2019

Over the course of several recent years Unified State Exam system in a number of subjects has undergone significant changes and has been brought to an optimal (in the opinion of the organizers) format, which makes it possible to fully assess the volume of knowledge of a graduate in a particular subject.

In 2018-2019, no fundamental changes are expected and it is safe to say that the same principles as in 2017-2018 will be applied to evaluate the work of graduates:

  1. automated verification of forms;
  2. involving experts in checking tasks with detailed answers.

How does a computer evaluate?

The first part of the examination paper involves a short answer to the questions posed, which the Unified State Examination participant must enter on a special answer form.

Important! Before starting work, be sure to read the rules for filling out the form, as incorrectly completed work will not pass the automated check.

It is quite difficult to challenge the result of a computer check. If the work was not counted due to the fault of a participant who filled out the form incorrectly, the result is considered unsatisfactory.

How do experts rate it?

In many subjects, in addition to the test part, there are tasks that require a full, detailed answer. Since it is impossible to automate the process of checking such answers, experts are involved in the verification - experienced teachers with extensive work experience.

Checking Unified State Exam teacher does not know (and even with a strong desire cannot find out) whose work lies in front of him and in what city (region) it was written. Testing is carried out on the basis of uniform assessment criteria developed specifically for each subject. Each work is checked by two experts. If the experts’ opinions coincide, the assessment is put on the form, but if independent appraisers disagree, then a third expert is involved in the verification, whose opinion will be decisive.

That is why it is important to write legibly and accurately so that there is no ambiguous interpretation of words and phrases.

Primary and test scores

Based on the test results, the Unified State Exam participant is awarded a certain number of primary points, which are then converted into text points (points for the entire test). IN different subjects There are different maximum primary points depending on the number of tasks. But after giving the result according to the appropriate table, the Unified State Examination participant receives a final test score, which is the official result of his final tests (maximum 100 points).

So, in order to pass the exam, it is enough to achieve the established minimum threshold of the primary score:

Minimum scores

primary

test

Russian language

Mathematics (profile)

Computer science

Social science

Foreign languages

Biology

Geography

Literature

Based on these numbers, you can accurately understand that the exam has been passed. But what grade? The 2018 online scale will help you with this, designed specifically for converting primary Unified State Exam scores into test scores, which will also be relevant for the 2019 results. A convenient calculator can be found on the website 4ege.ru.

Announcement of official results

Graduates are always concerned with the question of how quickly they can find out what result was obtained during the test and what the scale for converting the points scored on the Unified State Exam into traditional grades will be in 2019.

Teachers often take it upon themselves to reassure students by working through the tasks of the Unified State Exam tickets immediately after the exam and assessing the quality of the students’ work and the amount of initial points scored. Official results must be waited for 8-14 days, according to the established regulations for the Unified State Exam 2019. On average, organizers approve the following inspection schedules:

  • 3 days to check the work;
  • 5-6 days for processing information at the federal level;
  • 1 working day for approval of the results of the State Examination;
  • 3 days to post results online and transfer data to educational institutions.

In the event of unforeseen situations and technical problems, these deadlines may be revised.

You can find out your owl score:

  • directly at your school;
  • on the portal check.ege.edu.ru;
  • on the website gosuslugi.ru.

Converting points to grades

Since 2009, Unified State Examination results are not included in the graduate certificate. Therefore, today there is no official state system converting the Unified State Examination result into a grade on a school 5-point scale. As part of the entrance campaign, the test score obtained in the exam is always summed up and taken into account. But many students are still interested in finding out how they passed the exam - 3 or 4, 4 or 5. For this, there is a special table that details the correspondence for each of the 100 points in each subject.

Russian language

Mathematics

Computer science

Social science

Foreign languages

Biology

Geography

Literature

Using such a table is quite inconvenient. It is much easier to find out how you passed the Russian language, mathematics or history by using the online calculator 4ege.ru, which also contains a scale for converting Unified State Exam scores, which is relevant for graduates of 2019.

Having received the Unified State Exam result, you should decide on a university as quickly as possible, comparing your capabilities with the real competition for the specialties you are interested in. Thus, the practice of past years shows that in some cases it is difficult to get into the most popular areas in the capital’s universities even with high scores, because not only holders of 100-point scores will compete for places Unified State Exam results, and also winners of the largest Olympiads of the 2018-2019 academic year.

 


Read:



Before the verdict, Sergei Egorov asked for forgiveness from the relatives of those killed. Where did Egorov serve, who killed 9 people?

Before the verdict, Sergei Egorov asked for forgiveness from the relatives of those killed. Where did Egorov serve, who killed 9 people?

On the afternoon of August 29, the Tver Regional Court began to consider the merits of the case of mass murder near Tver. At the beginning of July 2017, in a dacha...

Germany's treacherous attack on the USSR

Germany's treacherous attack on the USSR

100 years ago, the Second Patriotic War of 1914-1917 began. We present to our readers an article from a book recently published in Nizhny Novgorod...

Key competencies and their assessment

Key competencies and their assessment

Sections: School administration The competency-based approach first began to be developed in England. It was an approach that was born and...

Brilev Sergei: biography and family Ordinary person Sergei Brilev: family, wife

Brilev Sergei: biography and family Ordinary person Sergei Brilev: family, wife

Sergei Brilyov is a television journalist, member of the Presidium of the Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, member of the Academy of Russian Television, deputy director...

feed-image RSS